#CHARTWAY LIVENOW ACCOUNT TRIAL#

Trump himself did not attend to the hearing on Tuesday. Such a proceeding is usually mundane in nature – the substance of the classified materials that Trump allegedly refused to return to the government will not be discussed – and typically focused on a scheduling plan for fulfilling the steps that CIPA lays out. Tuesday’s hearing was sought by the prosecutors under a provision of the Classified Information Procedures Act, which establishes the process for deciding how the highly secretive government documents that are at the heart of the prosecution will be handled in the case. Leaving the courtroom Tuesday, Trump’s lawyers declined to answer questions about his target letter from Smith as part of the investigation into the 2020 election aftermath, or questions about Tuesday’s hearing in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case.

#CHARTWAY LIVENOW ACCOUNT TRIAL#

Referring to the intense publicity the case would attract, Cannon asked Kise: “won’t that just continue” after the election? She told Kise to focus his arguments on the other reasons why the trial should not be expedited, such as the legal issues the case might prompt or the complexities of handling the classified info. While Cannon appeared receptive to defendants claims that other aspects of the case may require an extensive pre-trial period, she did not seem persuaded by the argument that Trump’s status as a candidate meant the trial would have to wait until after the election.

Harbach was responding to comment made by Trump attorney Christopher Kise, who was arguing that the 2024 election and the publicity it would bring to the case would make it impossible to have a fair trial before the election. “They are all here because a grand jury in this district returned an indictment of these defendants and they deserve a trial.” “There has been none,” Harbach said of political influence, noting that the current and former prosecutors on Smith’s team all served in career roles and that none of them were political appointees.

“The government says the claim is flat out false,” said prosecutor David Harbach, who pointed to the appointment of the special counsel and how that removed the potential for “political influence.” The defense attorneys told Cannon that they believed they would be able to review enough discovery by November to be able to suggest a potential trial date.Īn attorney for Trump claimed that the public viewed the special documents case as a top 2024 contender and the administration of his chief political rival “squaring off” in the courtroom – prompting aggressive push back from a lawyer for the special counsel. The judge also pressed the Trump legal team to commit to a timeline for at least some of the steps in the pre-trial process. Special counsel Jack Smith’s team and lawyers for Trump appeared Tuesday for the first time in front of Cannon, who will preside over the criminal case Smith has brought against the former president. US District Judge Aileen Cannon signaled she is likely to push back the start of a trial in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case beyond the mid-December date proposed by federal prosecutors – but appeared deeply skeptical of arguments from Donald Trump’s lawyers that he couldn’t get a fair trial while running for president.ĭuring the hearing in Fort Pierce, Florida, Cannon told the prosecutors that their timeline was “compressed” and said that cases like this take more time.Ĭannon did not decide on a trial date but said she plans to “promptly” issue an order on the matter.

Chartway livenow account